You asked

what was the common understanding of kingship in surrounding nations at that time?

Adds the setting and its conversation across both testaments.

1 Samuel 8:4-7

“Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel to Ramah. They said to him, "Behold, you are old, and your sons don't walk in your ways. Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations." The thing displeased Samuel, when they said, "Give us a king to judge us." Samuel prayed to Yahweh. Yahweh said to Samuel, "Listen to the voice of the people in all that they tell you; for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me, that I should not be king over them."”

This passage describes a pivotal moment in Israel's history, around the 11th century BCE. The prophet Samuel, an elderly judge, is confronted by the elders of Israel who demand a king to rule over them, mirroring the political structures of neighboring societies. This request represents a shift from a leadership model based on judges and direct divine guidance to a human monarchy.

What does it mean to trust a human leader while also acknowledging a divine authority?

Then — the setting

At the time this passage was written (likely centuries after the events, reflecting on the establishment of monarchy, possibly during or after the united monarchy), and certainly at the time of the events described (around 11th century BCE), kingship in the Ancient Near East was generally understood as a divinely sanctioned institution. Kings were often seen as divine representatives, sons of a god, or even gods themselves, responsible for maintaining cosmic order, justice, and prosperity. Their authority was absolute, and their primary functions included leading armies, administering law, and performing religious rituals. They were expected to be strong leaders who protected their people and expanded their territory, providing stability and security.

Across the Testaments

This Old Testament passage presents kingship as a human institution Israel desires 'like all the nations,' initially rejected by God as a rejection of his direct rule, but then permitted. The New Testament builds on this complex view, ultimately presenting Jesus as the 'King of kings' (Revelation 19:16) and 'Lord of lords.' While earthly kingship in the Old Testament is often flawed and leads to apostasy, Jesus' kingship is spiritual, serving, and redemptive, yet also authoritative. The New Testament often contrasts the worldly nature of human rule with the nature of God's eternal kingdom, fulfilling and reinterpreting the hopes for a righteous king that emerged from the Old Testament's monarchical experiments.

Keep thinking

Read alongside it

Deuteronomy 17:14-20
This earlier law anticipates Israel's desire for a king and sets boundaries for royal power.
Psalm 2
This psalm speaks of God's chosen king, asserting divine authority over human rulers.
Mark 10:42-45
Jesus redefines leadership, contrasting it with the dominant, power-driven model of worldly kings.

Ask your own follow-up